In this work we present an experimental comparison of six widely used quantification methods (Zadeh's scalar and fuzzy cardinality, Yager's OWA, Delgado's GD, Sugeno integral and Vila's VQ) when evaluating Type-1 and Type-2 linguistic descriptions of data generated from meteorological data provided by the Galician Meteorological Agency MeteoGalicia.
The objective of this study is to evaluate if there are significant differences among these models. We ranked the generated descriptions based on their fulfilment degree for each quantification model and we analysed those results calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results show that there are not significant differences in the models when evaluating Type-1 descriptions. However, in Type-2 evaluation the methods can be grouped in three clusters with a significantly different behaviour among them: i) Zadeh's scalar cardinality, Delgado's GD and Zadeh's fuzzy cardinality, ii) Yager's method and iii) Vila's VQ.
Keywords: fuzzy quantification, linguistic descriptions of data, natural language generation